The relationship between patient-specific factors and functional progression of COVID-19 survivors admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation facility.

BACKGROUND: Survivors of hospitalization for severe acute COVID-19 infection faced significant functional impairments necessitating discharge to inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for intensive rehabilitation prior to discharge home. There remains a lack of large cohort studies of the functional outcomes of patients admitted to IRFs with COVID-19-related impairments and the relationship to patient-specific factors. OBJECTIVE: To characterize functional outcomes of patients admitted to IRFs for COVID-19-related debility and to investigate associations between functional outcomes and patient-specific factors. DESIGN: Multisite retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Multiple IRFs in a large urban city. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients admitted to IRFs for rehabilitation after hospitalization for acute COVID-19 infection. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included change in GG Self-Care and Mobility Activities subscales and Functional Independence Measure scores from admission to discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Linear regression analysis was used to relate functional changes to demographic, medical, and hospitalization-specific factors. Secondary outcomes included discharge destination from the IRF. RESULTS: The analysis included n = 362 patients admitted to IRFs for COVID-19-related rehabilitation needs. This cohort showed significant improvements in mobility, self-care, and cognition congregate scores (216.0%, 174.3%, 117.6% respectively). Patient-specific factors associated with functional improvement, included age, body mass index, premorbid employment status, history of diabetes and cardiac disease and medications received in acute care, and muscle strength upon admission to IRF. CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation for COVID-19-related functional deficits made significant functional improvements in mobility, self-care, and cognition. Many significant associations were found between patient-specific factors and functional improvement, which support further investigation of these factors as possible predictors of functional improvement in an IRF for COVID-19-related deficits.

Social determinants of health and COVID-19 recovery after inpatient rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Neighborhoods with more social determinants of health (SDOH) risk factors have higher rates of infectivity, morbidity, and mortality from COVID-19. Patients with severe COVID-19 infection can have long-term functional deficits leading to lower quality of life (QoL) and independence measures. Research shows that these patients benefit greatly from inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF) admission, but there remains a lack of studies investigating long-term benefits of rehabilitation once patients are returned to their home environment. OBJECTIVE: To determine SDOH factors related to long-term independence and QoL of COVID-19 patients after IRF stay. DESIGN: Multisite cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Two urban IRFs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were Post-COVID Functional Status Scale (PCFS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores. Secondary outcomes were quality indicator (QI) scores while at IRF and a health care access questionnaire. Results were analyzed using analysis of variance and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Participants (n = 48) who were greater than 1 year post-IRF stay for severe COVID-19 were enrolled in the study. Higher SF-36 scores were associated with male gender (p = .002), higher income (≥$70,000, p = .004), and living in the city (p = .046). Similarly, patients who were of the male gender (p = .004) and had higher income (≥$70,000, p = .04) had a greater odds of a 0 or 1 on the PCFS. Age was not associated with differences. Women were more likely to seek follow-up care (p = .014). Those who sought follow-up care reported lower SF-36 overall and emotional wellness scores, p = .041 and p = .007, respectively. Commonly reported barriers to health care access were financial and time constraints. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SDOH risk factors need to be supported in the outpatient setting to maintain functional gains made during IRF stays. Female gender, income, and urban setting are potential predictors for long-term QoL and independence deficits after rehabilitation for COVID-19 infection. Low emotional wellness is an indicator for patients to seek out care as far out as 1 year from their rehabilitation stay.

Decreased bed mobility function is associated with post-discharge mortality for cancer patients in inpatient rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: The establishment of rehabilitation goals for hospitalized cancer patients depends on accurate medical prognosis and matching goals to clinical timelines. Current tools for estimating prognosis are limited. We hypothesized that bed mobility is a predictor of mortality in cancer patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation. DESIGN: In a retrospective cohort of 187 subjects with non-neurologic cancer admitted to inpatient rehabilitation, Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores and 6-month mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: In the cohort, survival rate was 71% at 6 months. In univariate analysis, discharge bed mobility score (OR = 0.75, 95%CI = 0.61 to 0.90, p = 0.003), bed mobility FIM gain (OR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.51 to 0.85, p = 0.002), and bed mobility FIM efficiency (OR = 0.011, 95%CI = 0.00032 to 0.21, p = 0.006) were inversely associated with 6-month mortality after discharge from IRF. In multivariate analysis with additional motor FIM items, only bed mobility (OR = 0.73, 95%CI = 0.54 to 0.97, p = 0.029) and grooming (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.99, p = 0.041) were independently associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Lower discharge and lower change in bed mobility FIM scores are associated with mortality in cancer patients in inpatient rehabilitation. Bed mobility could serve as a clinical tool for estimating medical prognosis in hospitalized cancer patients and should be validated in prospective studies.

Functional improvements of patients admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation facility after bilateral lung transplant due to severe COVID-19 pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has introduced a new subset of patients with acute end-stage lung damage for which lung transplantation has been successfully performed. OBJECTIVE: To describe the inpatient rehabilitation course of patients who underwent bilateral lung transplant due to severe COVID-19 pulmonary disease. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Free-standing, academic, urban inpatient rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen patients aged 28-67 years old (mean 53.9 ± 10.7) who developed COVID-19 respiratory failure and underwent bilateral lung transplant. INTERVENTIONS: Patients participated in a comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation program including physical, occupational, and speech therapy tailored to the unique functional needs of each individual. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures of functional improvements, include mobility and self-care scores on section GG of the Functional Abilities and Goals of the Improving Post-Acute Care Transformation Act, as defined as quality measures by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Other functional measures included 6 minute walk test, Berg balance scale, Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA), and Cognition and Memory Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores. Wilcoxon signed rank sum test was used to evaluate statistical significance of change between admission and discharge scores. RESULTS: Fourteen patients completed inpatient rehabilitation. Self-care (GG0130) mean score improved from 20.9 to 36.1. Mobility (GG0170) mean score improved from 30.7 to 70.7. Mean 6-minute walk distance improved from 174.1 to 467.6 feet. Mean Berg balance scores improved from 18.6/56 to 36.3/56. MASA scores improved from 171.3 to 182.3. All functional measures demonstrated statistically significant improvements with p value ≤ .008, except for cognition and memory FIM scores, which did not show a statistically significant difference. A majority (76%) of patients discharged home. CONCLUSION: This new and unique patient population can successfully participate in a comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation program and achieve functional improvements despite medical complications.

Comparative Study of the Pain, Function, and Biomarkers of Joint Disease in the Transition to Adulthood in Individuals With and Without Cerebral Palsy.

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers have potential to identify early signs of joint disease. This study compared joint pain and function in adolescents and young adults with cerebral palsy compared with individuals without. METHODS: This cross-sectional study compared individuals with cerebral palsy ( n = 20), aged 13-30 yrs with Gross Motor Function Classification System I-III and age-matched individuals without cerebral palsy ( n = 20). Knee and hip joint pain measured using Numeric Pain Rating Scale and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score surveys. Objective strength and function were also measured. Biomarkers for tissue turnover (serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein, urinary C-terminal crosslinked telopeptide of type II collagen) and cartilage degradation (serum matrix metalloproteinase 1, matrix metalloproteinase 3) were measured in blood and urinary samples. FINDINGS: Individuals with cerebral palsy had increased knee and hip joint pain, reduced leg strength, reduced walking and standing speeds, and ability to carry out activities of daily living ( P < 0.005) compared with controls. They also had higher serum matrix metalloproteinase 1 ( P < 0.001) and urinary C-terminal crosslinked telopeptide of type II collagen levels ( P < 0.05). Individuals with cerebral palsy who were Gross Motor Function Classification System I and II demonstrated reduced hip joint pain ( P = 0.02) and higher matrix metalloproteinase 1 levels ( P = 0.02) compared with Gross Motor Function Classification System III. INTERPRETATION: Individuals with cerebral palsy with less severe mobility deficits had higher matrix metalloproteinase 1 levels likely due to more prolonged exposure to abnormal joint loading forces but experienced less joint pain.

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on an international sample of golfers with disabilities.

INTRODUCTION: Participation in adaptive sports can mitigate the risk for obesity and social isolation/loneliness in individuals with disabilities (IWDs). The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and related changes in physical activity exacerbated existing barriers to participation in adaptive sports. There is limited literature assessing the potentially disproportionate effect of pandemic-related changes to physical activity in IWDs. OBJECTIVE: To determine how golf benefits IWDs and understand the effect of changes to golfing habits during the pandemic. DESIGN: A survey was distributed to all registered players (n = 1759) of the European Disabled Golf Association (April 2021). It assessed participants' demographic information (age, sex, race/ethnicity, nationality, impairment, golf handicap), golf habits before/after the pandemic, and perceived impact of golf and COVID-19-related golf restrictions to physical/mental health and quality of life (QoL). SETTING: European Disabled Golf Association (EDGA) worldwide database. PATIENTS: Responses were received from 171 IWDs representing 24 countries. Age 18 years or older and registration with EDGA were required for inclusion. INTERVENTIONS: Survey. OUTCOMES: Self-reported golfing habits, mental/physical health, and QoL. RESULTS: Mean participant age was 51.4 ± 12.9 years. Most respondents were amputees (41.5%) or had neurological diagnoses (33.9%). Pre-pandemic, 95% of respondents indicated that golf provided an opportunity to socialize, and most participants reported that golf positively affected physical/mental health and QoL. During the pandemic, more than 20% of participants reported golfing with fewer partners and 24.6% of participants reported playing fewer rounds per month (p < .001 for both); these findings were consistent across geographical region, ethnicity, and type of disability. Most participants (68.4%) perceived that their ability to golf had been impacted by COVID-19 and that these changes negatively affected their mental/physical health and QoL. CONCLUSIONS: Golf benefits the physical/mental health and QoL of IWDs internationally. Changes to golfing habits throughout the COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected these individuals. This highlights the need to create opportunities for physical activity engagement and socialization among adaptive athletes during a global pandemic.

The impact of a novel musculoskeletal consult service in an inpatient rehabilitation facility: A descriptive analysis.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal (MSK) pathologies significantly affect the rehabilitation course for patients admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF). The impact of a specialized inpatient MSK consult service has not been previously evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the demographics, pathologies, and impact on pain scores of patients who were evaluated by a specialized MSK consult service. DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive analysis of patients at an IRF who were evaluated by the MSK consult service. SETTING: Academic IRF. PARTICIPANTS: 230 patients evaluated by the MSK consult service over 4.5 years. INTERVENTIONS: MSK consult service composed of sports medicine fellowship-trained physiatrists who use history, physical examination, point-of-care ultrasound, and specialized MSK knowledge to assess and address MSK barriers to functional improvement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary rehabilitation diagnosis, length of stay, discharge destination, reason for consult, MSK diagnosis, need for injection, change in Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) pain scores, change in Functional Independence Measures (FIM). RESULTS: A total of 230 consults met inclusion criteria for analysis. The most common symptoms were shoulder pain (47%), knee pain (30%), and hip/groin pain (10.4%). The MSK consult service made 82 different musculoskeletal and neuromuscular diagnoses. The most common primary rehabilitation diagnosis was stroke (28.3%). Injections were performed in 44.3% of consults, with an average reduction in NPRS pain score of 2.3 (SD 1.9) and a statistically significant reduction in average NPRS pain scores in patients who underwent injections compared to those who did not (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to examine the use of an innovative inpatient MSK physiatry consult service in an IRF. This promising consult service can play a pivotal role in patient care by reducing functionally limiting MSK pain to allow for better toleration of therapies and to optimize functional gains.

Gait speed is a biomarker of cancer-associated cachexia decline and recovery.

Background: Progressive functional decline is a key element of cancer-associated cachexia. No therapies have successfully translated to the clinic due to an inability to measure and improve physical function in cachectic patients. Major barriers to translating pre-clinical therapies to the clinic include lack of cancer models that accurately mimic functional decline and use of non-specific outcome measures of function, like grip strength. New approaches are needed to investigate cachexia-related function at both the basic and clinical science levels. Methods: Survival extension studies were performed by testing multiple cell lines, dilutions, and vehicle-types in orthotopic implantation of K-ras LSL.G12D/+ ; Trp53 R172H/+ ; Pdx-1-Cre (KPC) derived cells. 128 animals in this new model were then assessed for muscle wasting, inflammation, and functional decline using a battery of biochemical, physiologic, and behavioral techniques. In parallel, we analyzed a 156-subject cohort of cancer patients with a range of cachexia severity, and who required rehabilitation, to determine the relationship between gait speed via six-minute walk test (6MWT), grip strength (hGS), and functional independence measures (FIM). Cachectic patients were identified using the Weight Loss Grading Scale (WLGS), Fearon consensus criteria, and the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI). Results: Using a 100-cell dose of DT10022 KPC cells, we extended the survival of the KPC orthotopic model to 8-9 weeks post-implantation compared to higher doses used (p<0.001). In this Low-dose Orthotopic (LO) model, both progressive skeletal and cardiac muscle wasting were detected in parallel to systemic inflammation; skeletal muscle atrophy at the fiber level was detected as early as 3 weeks post-implantation compared to controls (p<0.001). Gait speed in LO animals declined as early 2 week post-implantation whereas grip strength change was a late event and related to end of life. Principle component analysis (PCA) revealed distinct cachectic and non-cachectic animal populations, which we leveraged to show that gait speed decline was specific to cachexia (p<0.01) while grip strength decline was not (p=0.19). These data paralleled our observations in cancer patients with cachexia who required rehabilitation. In cachectic patients (identified by WLGS, Fearon criteria, or PNI, change in 6MWT correlated with motor FIM score changes while hGS did not (r 2 =0.18, p<0.001). This relationship between 6MWT and FIM in cachectic patients was further confirmed through multivariate regression (r 2 =0.30, p<0.001) controlling for age and cancer burden. Conclusion: Outcome measures linked to gait are better associated with cachexia related function and preferred for future pre-clinical and clinical cachexia studies.

Arthritis Foundation/HSS Workshop on Hip Osteoarthritis, Part 3: Rehabilitation and Exercise.

Far more publications are available for osteoarthritis of the knee than of the hip. Recognizing this research gap, the Arthritis Foundation (AF), in partnership with the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS), convened an in-person meeting of thought leaders to review the state of the science of and clinical approaches to hip osteoarthritis. This article summarizes the recommendations gleaned from 5 presentations given on hip-related rehabilitation at the 2023 Hip Osteoarthritis Clinical Studies Conference, which took place on February 17 and 18, 2023, in New York City.

Patient experiences receiving rehabilitation care via telehealth: Identifying opportunities for remote care.

Use of telehealth has grown substantially in recent times due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Remote care services may greatly benefit patients with disabilities; chronic conditions; and neurological, musculoskeletal, and pain disorders, thereby allowing continuity of rehabilitation care, reducing barriers such as transportation, and minimizing COVID-19 exposure. In March 2020, our rehabilitation hospital, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, launched a HIPAA-compliant telemedicine program for outpatient and day rehabilitation clinics and telerehabilitation therapy programs. The objective of this study was to examine patients' experiences and satisfaction with telemedicine in the rehabilitation physician practice, including novel virtual multidisciplinary evaluations. The present study examines survey data collected from 157 patients receiving telemedicine services at Shirley Ryan AbilityLab from December 2020-August 2021. Respondents were 61.8% female, predominantly White (82.2%) with ages ranging across the lifespan (69.4% over age 50 years). Diagnostic categories of the respondents included: musculoskeletal conditions 28%, chronic pain 22.3%, localized pain 10.2%, neurological conditions 26.8%, and Parkinson's and movement disorders 12.7%. Survey responses indicate that the telemedicine experiences were positive and well received. The majority of participants found these services easy to use, effective, and safe, and were overall satisfied with the attention and care they received from the providers-even for those who had not previously used telehealth. Respondents identified a variety of benefits, including alleviating financial and travel-related burdens. There were no significant differences in telehealth experiences or satisfaction across the different clinical diagnostic groups. Respondents viewed the integrated physician and rehabilitation therapist telehealth multidisciplinary model favorably, citing positive feedback regarding receiving multiple perspectives and recommendations, feeling like an integrated member of their healthcare team, and having a comprehensive, holistic team approach along with effective communication. These findings support that telemedicine can provide an effective care model in physiatry (physical medicine and rehabilitation) clinics, across different neurological, musculoskeletal, and pain conditions and in multidisciplinary team care settings. The insights provided by the present study expand our understanding of patient experiences with remote care frameworks for rehabilitation care, while controlling for institutional variation, and ultimately will help provide guidance regarding longer term integration of telemedicine in physiatry and multidisciplinary care models.

The Relationship Between Patient-Specific Factors and Discharge Destination After COVID-19 Hospitalization.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the discharge destinations and associated patient-specific factors among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was carried out at a single-site tertiary acute care hospital. RESULTS: Among 2872 patients, discharge destination included home without services ( n = 2044, 71.2%), home with services ( n = 379, 13.2%), skilled nursing facility (117, 4.1%), long-term acute care hospital ( n = 39, 1.3%), inpatient rehabilitation facility ( n = 97, 3.4%), acute care facility ( n = 23, 0.8%), hospice services ( n = 20, 0.7%), or deceased during hospitalization ( n = 153, 5.3%). Adjusting by covariates, patients had higher odds of discharge to a rehabilitation facility (skilled nursing facility, long-term acute care hospital, or inpatient rehabilitation facility) than home (with or without services) when they were older (odds ratio [OR], 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.80-3.11; P < 0.001), had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score (3-6: OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.34-4.15; P = 0.003; ≥7: OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.56-4.86; P < 0.001), were intubated or required critical care (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.48-3.13; P < 0.001), or had a longer hospitalization (3-7 days: OR, 12.48; 95% CI, 3.77-41.32; P < 0.001; 7-14 days: OR, 28.14; 95% CI, 8.57-92.43; P < 0.001). Patients were less likely to be discharged to a rehabilitation facility if they received remdesivir (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31-0.64; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-specific factors associated with COVID-19 hospitalization should be considered by physicians when prognosticating patient rehabilitation.

The global state of play: A study of the demographic characteristics of disability golfers.

BACKGROUND: Golf is a moderate-intensity physical activity that provides positive physical and mental health benefits. However, the inclusiveness of the sport for individuals with disabilities globally is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the demographics and disability characteristics of individuals engaging in disability golf globally. It was hypothesized that the majority of participants would be middle-aged, male, and from countries with higher gross domestic product, similar to the nondisabled population. DESIGN: Descriptive, cross-sectional analysis using European Disability Golf Association (EDGA) database. SETTING: Various international golf tournaments. PARTICIPANTS: Golfers (n = 1734) with disability from 44 countries registered with the EDGA (2017-2021). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOMES: Descriptive analyses of frequencies, distributions, and means differences of demographic characteristics (age, gender, type of disability, level of handicap, golf cart use, and country of origin) of golfers with disability were performed. Data provided analysis of the association between number of participants and a country's gross domestic product (GDP). RESULTS: Individuals had a mean age of 52.5 (±15.6) years: 1589 (91.6%) male and 145 (8.4%) female. Twenty-three countries had female participation. The most commonly reported primary disability diagnoses were neurologic (24.8%), orthopedic (21.4%), and amputation below the knee (14.4%). Neurologic impairments (24.7%) were most common in men and orthopedic impairments (29.7%) were most common in women. Individuals with neurological impairments (27.4%) most frequently required golf carts to play. The GDP of a country had a positive correlation (r = 0.68) with the number of registered golfers with disability. CONCLUSION: Golf is played by individuals with a variety of disabilities and provides numerous benefits. However, there is an underrepresentation of youth, women, and individuals with certain impairments and from lower-income countries. These are the potential areas of opportunity to improve engagement and inclusiveness of golf.

Challenges and Opportunities in Academic Physiatry: An Environmental Scan.

ABSTRACT: Environmental scans determine trends in an organization's or field's internal and external environment. The results can help shape goals, inform strategic decision making, and direct future actions. The Association of Academic Physiatrists convened a strategic planning group in 2020, composed of physiatrists representing a diversity of professional roles, career stages, race and ethnicity, gender, disability status, and geographic areas of practice. This strategic planning group performed an environmental scan to assess the forces, trends, challenges, and opportunities affecting both the Association of Academic Physiatrists and the entire field of academic physiatry (also known as physical medicine and rehabilitation, physical and rehabilitation medicine, and rehabilitation medicine). This article presents aspects of the environmental scan thought to be most pertinent to the field of academic physiatry organized within the following five themes: (1) Macro/Societal Trends, (2) Technological Advancements, (3) Diversity and Global Outreach, (4) Economy, and (5) Education/Learning Environment. The challenges and opportunities presented here can provide a roadmap for the field to thrive within the complex and evolving healthcare systems in the United States and globally.

Soothe the savage beast: Patient perceptions of the benefits of music therapy in an inpatient rehabilitation facility.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the known benefits of music therapy (MT) and its potential applications in an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF), there remains a lack of access to MT in a significant number of hospitals in the United States. Exploration of stakeholder (e.g., physician, therapist, and patient) perceptions as a potential barrier to uptake has been limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess the favorability of patients admitted to an IRF toward MT through the domains of knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs. We hypothesized that patient domain scores would reflect a favorable perception of MT across rehabilitation diagnoses. DESIGN: Descriptive and cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Free-standing, acute IRF. PATIENTS: A total of 119 English-speaking, adult patients across three impairment categories (general rehabilitation, spinal cord injury, and brain injury) were recruited over a 3-month period and during each patient's hospital stay. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A modified version of the Global Complementary/Alternative and Music Therapy Assessment (GCAMTA) measured the domains of knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs. RESULTS: An overall response rate of 79.3% was achieved. Most patients (n = 95; 79.8%) scored in either the favorable or neutral ranges of the instrument. Age correlated negatively (r = -0.193, p < .05) with total score, whereas highest level of education correlated positively (rs  = 0.222, p < .05). There were no significant differences in scores across impairment categories (V = 0.068, p = .232). Knowledge scores, controlling for education and age, predicted 30.4% of the variance in attitudes and beliefs scores (R2  = 0.304, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: It is unlikely that patient perceptions are a barrier to MT uptake. Younger, more educated patients have higher knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about MT. Increasing patient knowledge about MT may improve their attitudes and beliefs, thereby further optimizing this therapy for widespread use.

Perceived Facilitators and Barriers to Participation in Golf for People With Vision Impairment: A Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify facilitators and barriers to participation in vision impaired golf. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 12 vision impaired golfers, 10 guides, and 5 novices during the British VI Golf Open tournament in August 2021. RESULTS: Qualitative content analysis identified the benefits, facilitators, and challenges of playing vision impaired golf. The role of guides and future developments of the sport were furthermore identified. The benefits extend beyond those related to health, including personal development and a sense of purpose for players and of reward for guides. Facilitators were largely organizational and having appropriate support and a guide. The challenges to playing and guiding were practical, financial, and logistical. The need to attract a more diverse range of players, along with a reconsideration of the eligibility criteria, was central to the perceived sustainability of vision impaired golf. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the practical, financial, and logistical challenges contributing to vision impaired golf activity limitations and participation restrictions. Because of the health, personal, and psychosocial benefits, ways of providing practical, financial, and support networks to facilitate engagement in vision impaired golf should be sought. An evidence-based, sport-specific eligibility system was thought to be critical for the future promotion of vision impaired golf.

Reaching underserved domestic and international populations through Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Residency training: A survey of residents and program directors.

INTRODUCTION: In 2015, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported that over 400 million individuals worldwide lack access to medical care. In addition, clinicians are more likely to treat underserved patients during their careers if they have exposure to these populations during their training. OBJECTIVES: To analyze what forms of didactic experiences are available and which opportunities are the most valuable with domestic/international underserved populations in Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (PM&R) residency programs in the United States. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey using REDCap software. SETTING: PM&R residency programs in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 137 participants in Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited PM&R residencies in the United States (24 program directors and 113 residents). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surveys collected information regarding demographic data, prior global health training experiences, current residency training experiences involving domestic/international underserved populations being offered, participants' perceived importance of training experiences with domestic/international underserved population, barriers that impede these experiences, and if availability of these opportunities affected resident recruitment. RESULTS: Participants reported that their PM&R programs did not offer global health simulations (91.2%), educational tracks (75.2%), international electives (71.5%), or rotations with domestic underserved populations (48.9%). Residents viewed exposure to simulation labs (3.25/5), educational tracks (3.42/5), and electives (4.02/5) more importantly than attending physicians. Conversely, attending physicians viewed lectures (3.92/5), journal clubs (3.58), and rotations treating domestic underserved populations (4.42/5) more favorably. Both residents and attending physicians endorse lack of financial support and mentorship as barriers to these opportunities. Participants from all regions outside the Midwest reported that these educational opportunities would affect residency recruitment (56% vs. 31%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study assessing the current state of global health training opportunities for PM&R residents as well as the perceived value of such experiences. Many PM&R medical trainees desire exposure to global health medicine curriculum, and many would alter their residency selection based on its availability.

Relationship Between Socioeconomic Status and the Outcome of Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections for Lumbar Radiculopathy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between socioeconomic status and pain reduction from epidural steroid injections for lumbar radiculopathy. METHODS: The retrospective cohort consisted of patients undergoing epidural steroid injection for lumbar radiculopathy ( n = 544). Numeric Pain Rating Scale was measured at baseline and 2 wks after epidural steroid injection. Socioeconomic status was estimated using median family income in patients' ZIP code. Linear and mixed models examined demographic and clinical differences in pain before and after injection and whether family income moderated the effect. RESULTS: Majority of patients were White (72.4%), female (56.4%), engaged in physical activity (68.2%), and underwent unilateral, transforaminal epidural steroid injection (86.0% and 92.1%, respectively). Non-White patients and those who did not engage in physical activity had higher baseline pain ( P < 0.05). Lower socioeconomic status was associated with higher baseline pain (ß = 0.06 per $10,000, P = 0.01). Patients with lower socioeconomic status experienced larger improvement in pain after epidural steroid injection: -1.56 units for patients in the 10th percentile of family income versus -0.81 for 90th percentile. Being a current smoker was associated with higher pain (ß = 0.76, P = 0.03) and engaging in structured physical activity with less pain (ß = -0.07 P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Lower socioeconomic status was independently associated with higher pain alleviation after controlling for other potentially influential demographics. Modifiable lifestyle factors may be a target of potential intervention.

Relationship Between Cachexia and the Functional Progress of Patients With Cancer in Inpatient Rehabilitation.

PURPOSE: Although inpatient rehabilitation can improve functional independence in patients with cancer, the role of cachexia in this population is unknown. Our objectives were to:1) Establish prevalence of cachexia in a cohort of cancer patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation and its association with demographic and oncological history.2) Determine the relationship between the presence of cachexia and functional recovery and whether these patients in inpatient rehabilitation have a distinct prognosis. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 250 patients over 330 admissions to an inpatient rehabilitation facility. Body weight loss threshold and Weight Loss Grading Scale identified patients with and without cachexia. Main outcomes were functional independence measure scores, discharge destination, and 6-mo survival. RESULTS: Prevalence of cachexia in inpatient rehabilitation was 59% using consensus body weight loss criteria, and 77% of cancer patients had a Weight Loss Grading Scale score greater than 0. Patients with and without cachexia had similar motor and cognitive gains, although patients with severe cachexia had more limited functional gains ( P < 0.05) and increased odds of acute care return ( P < 0.01). Patients with a Weight Loss Grading Scale score of 4 had decreased survival at 6 mos ( P < 0.05) compared with noncachectic patients. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that there is a relationship between cachexia and recovery for cancer patients that should be further studied in rehabilitation settings.